Legal Opinion

Barnard v. Shirley

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided September 22, 1897No. 18,103PublishedCited by 7 opinions

From the Morgan Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcCabe, C. J.

The appellee sued the appellants to recover damages for, and to restrain them from causing cer’falh' mineral water coming from defendants' well to flow through a certain spring branch adjoining plaintiff’s land, by which the waters of said branch are befouled to the plaintiff’s injury. The issues made were tried by the court, resulting in a, finding and judgment against the defendants, according to the prayer of the complaint. That judgment was, on appeal to this court, reversed for error in sustaining a demurrer to the second paragraph of defendants’ an-I swer. Barnard v. Shirley, 135 Ind.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Barnard v. SherleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Allen v. Thornapple Electric Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1906
  2. City of Richmond v. TestIndiana Court of Appeals · 1897
  3. Hazard Powder Co. v. Somersville Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1905
  4. Irving Materials, Inc. v. CarmodyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Harp v. Iowa Falls Electric Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1923

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API