Legal Opinion · Dissent

Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Ayres J. Stockly and Esther W. Stockly

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided April 18, 1955No. 11435Published

1DissentKalodner, Circuit Judge

I disagree with the majority’s holding that Sections 12(d) and 51(b) of the Code, as amended by the Revenue Act of 1948, can be applied retroactively for the years 1936-1945 in computing the tax limitation on long-term compensation received in 1948.

Congress specifically made these so-called “income-splitting” provisions of the Revenue Act of 1948 applicable to taxable years beginning after December 31, 1947.1

The courts cannot by “judicial legislation” change the specifically stated effective date of a tax law.

I don’t see, as did the majority, any doubtful question with respect to the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hofferbert v. Marshall Et UxCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1952
  2. George K. Ford and Helen L. Ford v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API