Matthews v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MORRISON, Judge.
The offense is murder with malice; the punishment, death.
We first consider appellant’s contention that the trial court allowed and contributed to the systematic exclusion of prospective jurors who expressed general conscientious scruples against the imposition of the death penalty in violation of Witherspoon v. Illinois, 391 U.S. 510, 88 S.Ct. 1770, 20 L.Ed.2d 776 (1968).
When originally submitted to this Court the record, by agreement of appellant’s counsel, contained only the voir dire examination of venireman Franklin R. Bar ber (Sr.). 1 Because of the seriousness of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Hamilton v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Boulden v. HolmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Maxwell v. BishopSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Washburn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1958
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Singletary v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
- Stanley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
- Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1984
- Adwon v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1986
- Van Sickle v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.