Legal Opinion
Feliciano v. Autozone, Inc.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided May 21, 2013No. AC 34379PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FLYNN, J.
The plaintiff, Doris Feliciano, appeals from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the defendant, Autozone, Inc., on all five counts of the plaintiffs complaint alleging national origin discrimination, religious discrimination, sexual harassment, disability discrimination and race discrimination in *758violation of the Connecticut Fair Employment Practices Act, General Statutes § 46a-51 et seq., specifically, General Statutes § 46a-60.1 On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly rendered summary judgment because there existed genuine issues of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Craine v. Trinity CollegeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Connecticut Light & Power Co. v. Department of Public Utility ControlSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Spears v. GarciaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Curry v. Allan S. Goodman, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Martinez v. Premier Maintenance, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2018
- Agosto v. Premier Maintenance, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2018
- Anthony Guadino v. City of Hartford and Jason ThodyDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2025
- Feliciano v. Autozone, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2015