Legal Opinion
People v. Atul R.
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided June 13, 2008No. 4-07-0703PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McCULLOUGH
Following a July 2007 hearing, the trial court found respondent, Atul R, subject to involuntary treatment (405 ILCS 5/2 — 107.1 (West 2006)).
Respondent appeals, arguing that (1) the State failed to prove by clear and convincing evidence that he was subject to involuntary treatment, and (2) the trial court’s order authorizing involuntary treatment failed to comply with the Mental Health and Developmental Disabilities Code (Code) (405 ILCS 5/2 — 107.1(a—5)(1) (West 2006)) because his criminal defense attorney was not notified of the petition. Because we agree with respondent’s second argument,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- People v. Mary Ann P.Illinois Supreme Court · 2002
- People v. J.T.Illinois Supreme Court · 2006
- People v. SplettIllinois Supreme Court · 1991
- Poeple v. Robert S.Illinois Supreme Court · 2004
- In Re CEIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- People v. Val Q.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2009
- Seitz-Partridge v. Loyola University of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011
- People v. Eric H.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2010
- Behl v. DuffinAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010
- In re Christine R.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2019
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.