State v. Ritter
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtDenny, J.
The defendants' second and tenth assignments of error are based on their exceptions to the refusal of the court to sustain their motion for judgment as of nonsuit at the close of the State’s evidence and renewed at the close of all the evidence. On such motion, the evidence is to be considered in the light most favorable to the State, and it is entitled to the benefit of every reasonable inference to be drawn therefrom. S. v. Gentry, 228 N.C. 643, 46 S.E. 2d 863; S. v. Davenport, 221 N.C. 475, 42 S.E. 2d 686; S. v. Gordon, 225 N.C. 757, 36 S.E. 2d 143; S. v. Scoggins, 225 N.C. 71, 33 S.E. 2d…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State v. . DavenportSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
- State v. . CoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
- State v. . McKinnonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- State v. McKinnonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- State v. . MarshallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. CaseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- State v. KellySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- State v. McLawhornSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- State v. KluckhohnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- State v. BurgessSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.