Legal Opinion

Dunham v. Averill

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided May 15, 1877PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Petition in Equity, by the executors of James Root, for advice as to the .proper construction of his will; brought, to the Superior Court in Hartford County, and reserved, upon facts found, for the advice of this court. The case is fully stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtPardee, J.

James Root, of Hartford, died on the 17th day of April, 1875, having made a will upon the 14th day of July, 1874. Austin C. Dunham and John C. Parsons, of Hartford, and Loren Prentiss, of Ohio, who were named therein as executors, have brought their petition to the Superior Court, in which they say that two corporations, to wit, the American. Bible Society and the American and Foreign Bible Society claim the same legacy; that the corporation known as the Hartford Hospital claims to be entitled to a legacy under the tenth clause of the will, whereas the executors are of opinion that the same…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Comstock v. Hadlyme Ecclesiastical SocietySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1830
  2. Mann v. MannNew York Court of Chancery · 1814
  3. Brewster v. McCall's deviseesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1842
  4. Avery v. ChappelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1826
  5. Ayres v. WeedSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1844

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Weiss v. SotoWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Fairfield v. LawsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1883
  3. Covert v. SebernSupreme Court of Iowa · 1887
  4. Hinckley v. ThatcherMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885
  5. Day v. WeblerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1919

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API