Demartini v. City of San Francisco
California Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtVan Fleet, J.
— Plaintiffs brought this action to enjoin the superintendent of streets of the city and county of San Francisco from removing the improvements from, and opening up as a public street, a certain strip of land in said city and county. Plaintiffs had judgment in the court below. The defendants moved for a new trial, which was denied, and they appeal from the order upon a statement of the case.
Fifty vara lots numbered 38 and 14 are situated in the block or square of said city and county, lying ber tween Broadway and Pacific, and Kearny and Montgomery streets. Lot 38 is a rectangle, situated on…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- City of San Francisco v. CanavanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
- Quinn v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Tate v. City of SacramentoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
- Whelan v. BoydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
3Cited by9 opinions
- London & San Francisco Bank, Ltd. v. City of OaklandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1898
- City of Oakland v. Oakland Water Front Co.California Supreme Court · 1912
- County of Sacramento v. LauszusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- United States v. Certain Parcels of Land in Los Angeles CountyDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1945
- Dunn v. County of Santa CruzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.