Legal Opinion

MacO v. Baldwin Union Free School District

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided March 7, 2018No. 17-1539Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

17-1539 Maco v. Baldwin Union Free School District UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT’S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION “SUMMARY ORDER”). A PARTY CITING A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Nick's Garage, Inc. v. Progressive Casualty Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017
  2. Summa v. Hofstra UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
  3. Anthony J. Decintio v. Westchester County Medical Center County of Westchester, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
  4. Cox v. Warwick Valley Central School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
  5. Dorsett v. County of NassauCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API