Legal Opinion

United States v. Christopher Paul Cusumano, United States of America v. Robert William Porco

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided May 8, 1996No. 94-8056, 94-8057PublishedCited by 77 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON REHEARING EN BANC

BALDOCK, Circuit Judge.

Defendants Christopher Paul Cusumano and Robert William Porco entered conditional pleas of guilty to manufacturing marijuana, 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), and reserved their right to appeal the district court’s denial of their motion to suppress. The district court sentenced each Defendant to thirty-months imprisonment. On appeal, Defendants contend that the affidavit in support of the search warrant issued against their residence contained improper information drawn from the warrantless use of a thermal imager. Defendants tell us that a thermal imager…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Maynard v. CartwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Spector Motor Service, Inc. v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  5. Zobrest v. Catalina Foothills School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by77 opinions

  1. Alvarado v. KOB-TV, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
  2. Craig v. EberlyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  3. Lawmaster v. WardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
  4. United States v. Pearson, EricCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
  5. United States v. James Elkins Carol Elkins, United States of America v. Carol Elkins James ElkinsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002

72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API