Legal Opinion

Ellingson v. Ammann

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 10, 2013No. 26438PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZINTER, Justice.

[¶ 1.] At the start of each beekeeping season, Ellingson’s Inc. placed its honey bees on the real property of others, a common practice in the beekeeping industry. After Ellingson’s Inc. determined it would no longer own bees, it sought to lease to other beekeepers the right to place bees on the property of some of the landowners with whom Ellingson’s Inc. had been doing business. In the spring of 2011, Jim Ammann (Ammann), a competing beekeeper, sought permission to place his bees on the property of a number of the landowners who had previously given Ellingson’s Inc.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Biegler v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  2. State v. EngesserSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Mobridge Community Industries, Inc. v. Toure, Ltd.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Jones v. JonesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Hass v. WentzlaffSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Healy Ranch v. HealySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
  2. Reck v. S.D. Bd. of Pardons & ParolesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Black Hills Excavating Services, Inc. v. Retail Construction Services, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Reck v. S.D. Bd. of Pardons & ParolesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  5. Dunham v. SabersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API