Legal Opinion

In Re Mekler

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided May 25, 1979PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

The Censor Committee of this Court reported the respondent, Arlen B. Mekler, a member of the Delaware Bar, for disciplinary action upon the basis of the following findings of fact and conclusions of law:

I

Findings of Fact

“1. On October 24, 1974, Jay Samuels (sometimes referred to as Jay Samuel, Jay Sukno Samuels, or Jay Samuel Sukno, hereinafter referred to as ‘Samuels’) consulted with Respondent with regard to a demand made by Wilmington Piano Company (‘Wilmington Piano’) for the immediate payment of the balance due or for the immediate return of a piano delivered by Wilmington Piano to…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. State Bar of Nevada v. ClaiborneNevada Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. KerpelmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  3. In Re a Member of the Bar of the State MeklerSupreme Court of Delaware · 1995
  4. In the Disciplinary Matter Involving VollintineAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
  5. In the Disciplinary Matter Involving VollintineAlaska Supreme Court · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API