Legal Opinion

Fatte Alberts v. Pizzaman's Pavilion

District Court, E.D. California

Decided July 13, 2020No. 1:20-cv-00238Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 FATTE ALBERTS, a California No. 1:20-cv-00238-DAD-SKO partnership, 12 Plaintiff, 13 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT v. JENSEN’S MOTION TO DISMISS THIS 14 ACTION FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER PIZZAMAN’S PAVILION and MICHAEL JURISDICTION AND DENYING HIS 15 JENSEN, MOTION TO CHANGE VENUE AS HAVING BEEN RENDERED MOOT 16 Defendants. (Doc. Nos. 9, 12) 17 18 19 This matter is before the court on the motions to dismiss this action for lack of subject 20 matter jurisdiction and to change venue filed by pro se defendant…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Safe Air for Everyone v. MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  3. Boag v. MacDougallSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Land v. DollarSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. Douglas Leite v. Crane CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API