Legal Opinion

Drake v. Ryan

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided May 28, 1993No. C1-92-1762PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAVIES, Judge.

The plaintiffs, defendants, and primary insurer executed an agreement releasing defendants from any personal liability arising from an automobile accident and their primary insurer from its contractual obligation, but preserving the liability of the excess insurer. The trial court upheld the release and certified the question of its validity. We affirm, and answer the certified questions.

FACTS

On December 21, 1988, appellant James Ryan (“Ryan”) collided with a caí driven by respondent lone Drake. Ryan was driving a car owned by his brother, Richard Ryan. The Ryans were…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Loy v. BundersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Miller v. ShugartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  3. Schmidt v. ClothierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  4. Chergosky v. Crosstown Bell, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  5. Continental Casualty Co. v. Reserve InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Drake v. RyanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
  2. Booth v. GadesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API