Woods v. State

The state’s evidence established the corpus delicti, and upon this question there was no dispute or controversy.

The evidence, without dispute, disclosed that two men were present and engaged in the operation of one of the several stills found and destroyed by the raiding officers upon the occasion complained of. The several state witnesses testified that this appellant was one of the men, and that one Hill was the other.

Defendant strenuously denied being present at the still and insisted he was elsewhere at the time and place testified to by the state’s witnesses. He also offered the…