Legal Opinion
Young v. Baugh
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided January 6, 1944No. 155PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CAYTON, Associate Judge.
Plaintiffs sued in the Landlord and Tenant Branch of the trial court to recover possession of real estate owned by them and which they claimed they desired for their “immediate and personal use and occupancy as a dwelling” under the provisions of Section 5 (b) (2) of the District of Columbia Emergency Rent Act.1 The trial court directed a verdict against them on the sole ground of the insufficiency of the notice to quit. They appeal.
There is no question that the tenancy here involved is one from month to month, and that under the Code, § 45 — 902, tenant was entitled…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Eddins v. Galloway Coal Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1921
- Byrne v. MorrisonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1905
- Klein v. MilesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1944
- Merritt v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
- Boss v. HaganCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1919
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Camalier & Buckley-Madison, Inc. v. The Madison Hotel, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
- Zoby v. KosmadakesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1948
- Klein v. MilesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1944
- District of Columbia Department of Housing & Community Development v. PittsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977
- Lynch v. BernsteinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1946
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.