Legal Opinion
Robillard v. Robbins
New York Court of Appeals
Decided November 25, 1991PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
While defendants urge that it was error to allow plaintiffs medical expert to express opinions on the very questions to be resolved by the jury, their general objections were insufficient to preserve a law issue for our review (see, Matter of Gonzalez v State Liq. Auth., 30 NY2d 108, 112-113; Wightman v Campbell, 217 NY 479, 482-483).
Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa concur.
Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Gonzalez v. State Liquor AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
- Wightman v. . CampbellNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
3Cited by23 opinions
- Dufel v. GreenNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Peguero v. 601 Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Barrowman v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Countermine v. GalkaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Dufel v. GreenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.