Legal Opinion
Turbocare Division of Demag Delaval Turbomachinery Corp. v. General Electric Co.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided August 9, 2002No. CIV.A. 95-30069-MAPPublished
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM REGARDING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF NON-INFRINGEMENT AND INVALIDITY (Docket No. 226)
PONSOR, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
The plaintiff, Turbocare Division of De-mag Delaval Turbomachinery Corp. (“plaintiff’), has brought suit against General Electric Co. (“defendant”), for the alleged infringement of U.S. Patent No. 4,436,311 (“the ’311 patent”), which is directed to a shaft sealing system for fluid turbines. Defendant has moved for summary judgment of noninfringment and invalidity. The motion will be denied. Disputed issues of material fact prevent the court from…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Festo Corp. v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.