Legal Opinion · Dissent

O'RIORDAN v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 21, 1984No. CR 84-8Published

1DissentJohn I. Purtle, Justice

I dissent because I think the complaining witness, Bill W. Willis, used the criminal laws of this state, by and with the aid and consent of local townspeople, to try to collect a civil debt. According to the record Mr. Willis sold the appellant a 16 foot shop-made trailer for $900 on credit. In fact appellant executed a promissory note which was due on the 17th day of January, 1980. The seller also gave a bill of sale to the appellant. After the shop-made trailer was loaded for the first time, in Houston, Texas, it developed problems which necessitated repair. Appellant called Willis on…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cates v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1979
  2. Wiley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1980
  3. Leonard v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926
  4. Ross v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
  5. Dean v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API