Legal Opinion

State v. Emanuel

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided October 21, 1994No. 91-555PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThayer, J.

The defendant, Michael Emanuel, appeals from his conviction for theft by unauthorized taking, RSA 637:3 (1986), based on a jury verdict in the Superior Court (O’Neil, J.). The defendant argues that the trial court erred: (1) by allowing defense counsel to withdraw six days prior to trial; (2) by failing to adequately inform the defendant of the risks of self-representation and securing a knowing and intelligent waiver of his right to representation; and (3) by denying the defendant a continuance to retain new counsel. We find that the trial court erred in allowing defense counsel to withdraw,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. CavanaughMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  2. State v. LinskySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
  3. Smith v. BryantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  4. People v. KinionIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
  5. State v. DeckerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. DeButts v. LarocheSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1998
  2. Franklin v. CallumSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
  3. Corbo v. StephensAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  4. State v. DahoodSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999
  5. United States v. CalhounUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API