Legal Opinion

Briscoe v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 2, 1926No. 10212Published

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

HAWKINS, Judge.

In his motion for rehearing appellant renews only his claim that there was intentional discrimination in excluding from the grand jury persons of the negro race, to which he belonged.

We have again reviewed all the evidence introduced by appellant on this issue and are confirmed in oúr view that the conclusion announced in our original opinion is correct. The bur den was on appellant to show race discrimination in the selection of the grand jury which returned the indictment. Lewis v. State, 42 Tex. Crim. Rep. 278, 59 S. W. 1116; Martin v. State, 44 Tex.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Thomas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1906
  2. Martin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1903
  3. Lewis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1900
  4. Mitchell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API