Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Hall v. Bratsberg

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 1937No. File No. 7969Published

1Opinion of the CourtPcxlley, J.

This is a mandamus proceeding brought pursuant to the provisions of section 4 of chapter 188, Laws 1935. Some five or six different parties, of whom W. S. Mitchell, plaintiff in intervention, was one, applied to the Board of County Commissioners of Sanborn County for appointment as county superintendent of highways. Mitchell received the appointment.

All of said applicants except Mitchell are honorably discharged soldiers of the World War and claim that chapter 188, Laws 1935, gives them a preference right to the appointment. After the appointment was made, plaintiff instituted this proceeding…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Meehan v. EmpieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  2. State ex rel. Taggart v. AddisonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  3. State ex rel. Mortensen v. CopelandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
  4. State ex rel. Benest v. McNeillSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API