State, City of Loretto v. Tofte
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EDWARD D. MULALLY, Judge. *
Appellant Pamela Tofte challenges the constitutionality of the restrictions on her driver’s license and her conviction of violating the restricted license under Minn.Stat. § 171.09(1996).
FACTS
On January 30, 1984, appellant’s driver’s license was cancelled as “inimical to public safety,” pursuant to Minn.Stat. §§ 171.14 and 171.04(8) (1982). As a part of reinstatement, appellant, on September 26, 1985, signed a form agreeing to total abstinence as a condition for receipt of driving privileges and stating that any use of alcohol or drugs coming to the attention…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. WebbSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- State v. MosengSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
- Askildson v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- Plaster v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
- LaMusga v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. RhodeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- State v. StoskopfCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002