Legal Opinion

State, City of Loretto v. Tofte

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided May 20, 1997No. C6-96-2236PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EDWARD D. MULALLY, Judge. *

Appellant Pamela Tofte challenges the constitutionality of the restrictions on her driver’s license and her conviction of violating the restricted license under Minn.Stat. § 171.09(1996).

FACTS

On January 30, 1984, appellant’s driver’s license was cancelled as “inimical to public safety,” pursuant to Minn.Stat. §§ 171.14 and 171.04(8) (1982). As a part of reinstatement, appellant, on September 26, 1985, signed a form agreeing to total abstinence as a condition for receipt of driving privileges and stating that any use of alcohol or drugs coming to the attention…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. WebbSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  2. State v. MosengSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  3. Askildson v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  4. Plaster v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
  5. LaMusga v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. RhodeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
  2. State v. StoskopfCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API