Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Nicolin v. Board of County Commissioners

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 26, 1890PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal by the relator from an order of the district court for Scott county, Edson, J., presiding, quashing an alternative writ of mandamus.

1Opinion of the CourtVanderburgh, J.

Upon the former appeal in this case from the order allowing a peremptory writ of mandamus against the defendants, county commissioners, directing them to act upon the petition of the relator and others for a change of the county-seat of Scott county, under the provisions of Laws 1889, c. 174, it was determined that the notice required by that act to be given was a condition precedent to action by the board upon the petition. State v. Com'rs of Scott Co., 42 Minn. 284, (44 N. W. Rep. 65.) This is an appeal from an order of the district court quashing and dismissing the subsequent writ of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. King v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  2. Wilson v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1879
  3. State ex rel. Nicolin v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Comstock v. City of Eagle GroveSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  2. Tucker v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
  3. State ex rel. Brown v. ButlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
  4. In Re Petition for Change of County SeatSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API