Legal Opinion

Dollfus v. Frosch

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 15, 1843Published

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court, Bronson, J.

A motion cannot be renewed without first obtaining leave of the court. (Mitchell v. Allen, 12 Wend. 290).(a) And this rule applies to motions for a commission, as well as in other cases. (Allen v. Gibbs, 12 Wend. 202.) In that case a commission was denied by this court on the ground that a previous application had been refused by the circuit judge. If a motion cannot be renewed here after it has been passed upon by a commissioner, clearly the commissioner should not act after we have decided the question.

The fact that the papers were insufficient on the first…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mithell v. AllenNew York Supreme Court · 1835
  2. Allen v. GibbsNew York Supreme Court · 1834
  3. Standard v. WilliamsNew York Supreme Court · 1833

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API