Legal Opinion

Erickson v. Grande Ronde Lumber Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 26, 1939Published

1Opinion

Petition for rehearing denied September 26, 1939

On Petition eor Behearing

(94 P. (2d) 139)

ROSSMAN, J.

The petition for a rehearing and its accompanying briefs, filed by the two respondents, criticize not only the conclusion announced in our decision but also the facts and legal principles which we employed in reaching it.

In our decision we stated that the capital stock of the Nibley-Mimnaugh Company, the Grande Bonde Company and the Stoddard Company (the latter two being the respondents) was “largely owned by the same individuals.” This statement is criticized by the respondents as unsupported…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Erickson v. Grande Ronde Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Feldman v. McGuireOregon Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Home v. SellingOregon Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Miles v. BowersOregon Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Bohanan v. PopeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1856

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API