Legal Opinion

Minneapolis Threshing MacHine Co. v. Bradford

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 7, 1921PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Pettis County. — How. Hopkins B. Shain, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtTrimble, P. J.

Having sold a threshing outfit to defendant and accepted a chattel mortgage thereon for the unpaid purchase money, plaintiff brought replevin based on said chattel mortgage to recover possession of said outfit; and under the writ it was taken from defendant, who, in his answer, demanded its return and set up as a defense a counterclaim for certain damages based upon a breach of plaintiff’s contract in selling him the outfit.

Plaintiff introduced the chattel mortgage and rested as soon as it was disclosed that three of the unpaid notes, aggregating $1552 of principal, were due at time of the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Wakeman v. Wheeler & Wilson Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
  2. Skagit Railway & Lumber Co. v. ColeWashington Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Guetzkow Bros. v. A. H. Andrews & Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Illinois Central Railroad v. Cobb, Christy & Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1872
  5. Abbott v. HapgoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Tnemec Company, Inc. v. North Kansas City Development Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1956
  2. Spruce Co. v. MaysSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  3. Benton v. Alcazar Hotel Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1946
  4. Wandell v. RossMissouri Court of Appeals · 1952
  5. Mayfield v. George O. Richardson MacHinery Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1921

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API