Legal Opinion

Cockburn v. Stanton

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 12, 1937No. 1642Published

1Opinion of the Court

GRISSOM, Justice.

Stanton sued Cockburn and Smythe to recover a %a interest in an oil and gas lease, etc. Stanton alleged, in substance, that he, Cockburn, and Smythe associated themselves for the purpose of obtaining an interest in an oil and gas leasé and procuring a drilling contract to develop the lease. It was alleged that said parties agreed upon an equal division of profits derived from their joint efforts directed toward such end. They contacted Martin, who owned an oil and gas lease on about 40 acres of land, subject to a debt of $150,000 “to be paid out of ½ of ⅞ of all oil and gas…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Allen v. AllenTexas Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Arrington v. McDanielTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929
  3. Long v. LongCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1902
  4. Whitten v. WhittenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  5. Bell v. BeckumCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API