Carey v. Discount Corp.
Hawaii Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT BY
KEMP, C. J.
The appeals in the foregoing two cases by the petitioner against different respondents involve the same issue. The plea of res judicata of each of the respondents was sustained. From the orders sustaining the pleas and dismissing the bills the petitioner prosecutes these appeals, which have been consolidated and argued together. Each appeal presents the sole question of the correctness of the order or decree sustaining the plea of res judicata.
For convenience, the appeal in the case against The Discount Corporation, Limited, will be discussed, and the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Gould v. Evansville & Crawfordsville R. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. SlaghtSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Alley v. NottSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Hawaiian Commercial & Sugar Co. v. Wailuku Sugar Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1902
- Sperry & Hutchinson Co. v. BlueCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1912
3Cited by1 opinion
- Yoshida v. Nobrega, Adm'rHawaii Supreme Court · 1952