Legal Opinion

Alabama Fuel & Iron Co. v. Andrews

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 14, 1926No. 6 Div. 554PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.

Appellee recovered a judgment for $1 against appellant in this trespass action, which, upon motion of plaintiff, was set aside. Defendant prosecutes this appeal to review the ruling of the court in setting aside said judgment.

For a report of the former appeal in this cause see Alabama Fuel & Iron Co. v. Andrews, 212 Ala. 336, 102 So. 799, where a sufficient outline of the case appears without necessity for repetition here.

As the verdict in this case was for the plaintiff, the action of the trial court in granting a new trial could only properly be rested upon the inadequacy of the sum…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Montgomery Light & Traction Co. v. KingSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
  2. National Surety Co. v. MabrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1903
  3. Manegold v. BeavanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
  4. Alabama Fuel & Iron Co. v. AndrewsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  5. Mobile & Ohio R. R. v. BrassellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Moore v. Mobile Infirmary Ass'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  2. Yarbrough v. MallorySupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  3. German-American Wholesale Optical Co. v. RosenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  4. Sims v. WarrenAlabama Court of Appeals · 1946
  5. Hunter v. SchemesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API