Legal Opinion

Shrigley v. Pierson

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 11, 1934No. 4-3488PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

Mrs. Pierson, the plaintiff below, alleged and offered testimony legally sufficient to establish the fact that she had been invited to ride in and to drive a car owned by a Mr. Shrigley — the defendant below — the steering gear of which was defective, and because of the defect she was unable to control the car, which ran off the road, turning over, and inflicting upon Mrs. Pier-son serious and permanent injuries. Mrs. Pierson drove the car from Clarksville, of which city she and Mr. Shrigley were residents, to Fayetteville, a trip any one would be pleased to take who knew what to expect in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Howe v. LittleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Olson v. BuskeySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  2. Peay v. PanichSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935
  3. Dierks Lumber & Coal Co. v. MabryCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942
  4. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. PiersonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1937
  5. Shrigley v. PiersonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API