Legal Opinion

United States v. Mark E. Huddleston

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided October 19, 1999No. 99-1144PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SELYA, Circuit Judge.

For many years, the courts of appeals have been divided over what legal standard obtains when a convicted defendant premises a motion for new trial on a claim that he has newly discovered that the case against him was based in part on the prosecutor’s unwitting use of perjured testimony. Some courts apply a “probability” standard in such situations, granting relief only if the discovery “probably” or “likely” — courts in this context use the terms interchangeably, and we shall use the former — would lead to an acquittal. See United States v. Torres, 128 F.3d 38, 49 (2d…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. United States v. PiresCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
  2. United States v. Larry Boone, United States of America v. Thomas Weston, AKA Rasul Thomas Weston, United States of America v. Thomas Weston, AKA RasulCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
  3. United States v. Rivera-AliceaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
  4. United States v. Dennis R. Josleyn, United States of America v. John W. Billmyer, United States of America v. Dennis R. Josleyn and John W. BillmyerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
  5. United States v. Daniel Paniagua-RamosCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API