Legal Opinion
Ruotolo v. State
New York Court of Claims
Decided September 2, 1988No. Claim No. 70726PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Gerard M. Weisberg, J.
On February 14, 1984 parolee George Agosto shot and killed Police Officer Thomas Ruotolo and seriously injured Officers Hipólito Padilla and Tanya Brathwaite as they attempted to apprehend him. Agosto, it is alleged, was at large because his parole officers violated section 259-i (3) of the Executive Law *112and section 8004.2 (9 NYCRR) of the regulations promulgated thereunder by failing to report Agosto’s arrest for burglary to the Parole Board. The issue before us is whether this asserts a cause of action in light of Tarter v State of New York (68 NY2d…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- H. R. Moch Co. v. Rensselaer Water Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Cuffy v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Burns Jackson Miller Summit & Spitzer v. LindnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Eiseman v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Kelly v. Diesel Construction Division of Carl A. Morse, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1974
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Schiavone v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
- Ruotolo v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- Ruotolo v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Ruotolo v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Ruotolo v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.