Legal Opinion

Duy v. Knowlton

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Indiana

Decided October 28, 1882PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Gresham, D. J.

The usual process was issued in this case, directed to the marshal, commanding him to summon the defendant. The marshal refuses to serve the process until the proper fees are paid in advance or a deposit of money made for their security. A rule is *108asked against the marshal to show cause why he should not be punished for contempt for his refusal to serve the process.

In settling his accounts with the proper accounting officers of ¡the treasury department, the marshal is charged with all fees earned by him, and from the amount thus earned he is allowed to retain for his personal…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Brewer v. HunterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1947
  2. Cohn v. GeorgeDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API