Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Taylor v. Peoples Natural Gas Co.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided March 9, 1995No. 94-3109Unknown

1ConcurrenceCowen, Circuit Judge

I join in Parts I and.HD of the majority opinion and therefore concur as to the judgment in this case. I am unable to join in Parts IIA-C, however, because I believe that the majority’s opinion sweeps more broadly than is justified under the facts presented here.

At issue in this case is a statement made-by John Burgunder, The Peoples National Gas Company’s Supervisor of Employee Benefits, to Thomas Taylor, a former employee of The Peoples National Gas Company (“PNG”), concerning the retroactivity of a potential amendment to PNG’s pension plan. According to Taylor, Burgunder misrepresented to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. John Allan CrawleyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
  3. A. J. Korioth v. Honorable Dolph Briscoe v. City of Farmers Branch, Movant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
  4. United States v. Nicomedes Martinez-HidalgoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  5. United States v. Rufus A. RiasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API