Legal Opinion
Griffith Laboratories U.S.A., Inc. v. Pomper
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 3, 1985No. 83 Civ. 3934(MEL)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LASKER, District Judge.
In an earlier opinion, we found defendants Richard Pomper and Presco Products, Inc. (“Presco”) liable to plaintiff Griffith Laboratories U.S.A., Inc. (“Griffith”) for violating a customer non-solicitation clause in a salesman-employment contract between Griffith and Pomper. See Griffith Laboratories U.S.A., Inc. v. Pomper, 577 F.Supp. 903 (S.D.N.Y.), aff'd mem., 740 F.2d 954 (2d Cir.1984). Griffith now moves pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(c) for an order awarding it punitive damages in an amount to be determined at the forthcoming damages trial.
Defendants…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Kelsay v. Motorola, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1978
- Evans Products Co. And Home Builders Mortgage Corp. v. West American Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- International Harvester Credit Corp. v. East Coast TruckCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- Tower Oil & Technology Co. v. BuckleyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
- Eusebio Guerrero Guillen, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross v. Thomas Kuykendall, Defendant-Cross and C. R. KuykendallCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Levy v. Runnells (In Re Landbank Equity Corp. )District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1987
- Greenberg v. Cross Island Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2007
- Capax Discovery, Inc. v. AEP RSD Investors, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2021
- Kozlowski v. JFBB Ski Areas, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
- Tang Capital Partners, LP v. BRC Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2025
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.