Beneks v. State

—Appellant was charged with and convicted of having procured one Nick Pasko to set fire to restaurant fixtures, equipment, and supplies, the property of appellant, for the purpose of defrauding an insurance company which had a policy upon the property.

The overruling of appellant’s motion to quash the indictment is assigned as error. It is contended that the indictment does not charge that there was a fire insurance policy in full force and effect. That part of the indictment involved reads as follows: “For which said restaurant fixtures, equipment and supplies a policy of insurance for one…