Legal Opinion

Cooper-Snell Co. v. State

New York Court of Claims

Decided October 15, 1919No. Claims Nos. 1549-A and 1688-APublishedCited by 2 opinions

Motions by claimant for orders vacating and setting-aside orders dismissing claims and to restore the claims to the calendar.

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

Separate motions have been made by claimant in the above claims for orders vacating and setting aside orders granted by this court at its-Utica, 1919, term held on January 6, 1919, dismissing these claims, and to restore the claims to the calendar.

The claims were regularly upon the calendar at the Utica term and had been duly noticed for trial by the attorney-general but claimant was not present nor represented in court, claiming that there was a misunderstanding or a breach of an understanding between its counsel and a member of the attorney-general’s staff as to the disposition that would…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ross v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1918
  2. Ross v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Backes v. Catholic Family & Community ServicesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
  2. Cooper-Snell Co. v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API