State v. Chaffin
Supreme Court of North Carolina
ÍNdiotmeNt, under landlord and tenant act, The Code, sec. 1761, for removing an outhouse from the premises during the tenancy. There was a verdict of guilty, and appeal by defendants. The case on appeal, signed by the Solicitor and counsel of defendants, is prefixed to the opinion. Statement of Case on Appeal. This was a criminal action, tried before Coble, J., and a jury in FoRSytti Superior Court.
Read the full summary
ÍNdiotmeNt, under landlord and tenant act, The Code, sec. 1761, for removing an outhouse from the premises during the tenancy. There was a verdict of guilty, and appeal by defendants. The case on appeal, signed by the Solicitor and counsel of defendants, is prefixed to the opinion. Statement of Case on Appeal. This was a criminal action, tried before Coble, J., and a jury in FoRSytti Superior Court. The defendants were indicted for removing an outhouse, under the Landlord and Tenant Act Code, from land bought by the prosecutor at Commissioners’ sale in 189 — , when and where the Commissioners…
1Opinion of the Court
Clark, ,T.
The case on appeal, was agreed upon by the Solicitor and the counsel for the defendant. Such being the *665case; there is no ground for action by the Judge, State v. Cameron, 121 N. C., 572, Tbe Code, sec. 1234; nor for a certiorari to correct the case by the Judge’s notes of the evidence on file; nor to permit the Judge to' correct the case. If, in the interest of justice, this can be allowed in any case , (which is possible) it would be an exceptional one-, and upon ■specific allegations which have not been made in the present instance. It was the Solicitor himself who assented to the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State v. CameronSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. . StevensSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910