Seward v. Heinze
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
DONOVAN, District Judge (Sitting by Assignment).
This matter comes before the Court on application by petitioner for a writ of habeas corpus. Petitioner claims he “is now illegally and unlawfully restrained and deprived of his lawful rights, by "* * * [respondent], contrary to and in violation of privileges and immunities, equal protection of law and -due process of law clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States and in violation of similar provisions of Article 1, Section 13, of the [West’s Ann.] California Constitution * *
The facts recited by petitioner…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- McNally v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- United States Ex Rel. Darcy v. HandySupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Higgins v. SteeleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1952
- Sampsell v. People of State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
- Woollomes v. Heinze, Warden of California State Prison at FolsomCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Edward Charles Curtis v. John E. Bennett, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
- In re NiewinskiDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1961