In re Davenport
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Willett
in which Chief Justice Hecht, Justice Green, Justice Johnson, Justice Guzman, Justice Devine, and Justice Brown joined.
This dispute arises from a contingency fee agreement for legal services. The trial court granted a new trial, in part, because the pertinent agreement “unambiguously” permitted the lawyers to recover an ownership interest as attorney fees. However, we conclude that the trial court’s finding was an abuse of discretion because the agreement unambiguously states that the lawyers were only entitled to attorney fees from a monetary recovery. Accordingly, we conditionally grant…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Coker v. CokerTexas Supreme Court · 1983
- Heritage Resources, Inc. v. NationsBankTexas Supreme Court · 1997
- American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Co. v. SchaeferTexas Supreme Court · 2003
- Gilbert Texas Construction, L.P. v. Underwriters at Lloyd's LondonTexas Supreme Court · 2010
- R & P Enterprises v. LaGuarta, Gavrel & Kirk, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1980
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Uri, Inc. v. Kleberg Cnty.Texas Supreme Court · 2018
- Texan Land & Cattle II, Ltd. v. Exxon Mobil Pipeline Company, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2019
- 180 Talmadge, Inc. v. Michael Lam, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2024
- Austin JSB, Ltd. v. Otwell Realty, Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2023
- BarZ Adventures Inc v. PatrickDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2023
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.