Legal Opinion
Two Hawk v. Rosebud Sioux Tribe
District Court, D. South Dakota
Decided September 15, 1975No. CIV 75-3023PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BOGUE, District Judge.
Plaintiffs bring this action pursuant to 25 U.S.C. § 1302, the 1968 Indian Bill of Rights, seeking injunctive and declaratory relief preventing the defendants from disqualifying Plaintiff Webster Two Hawk as a candidate for President of the Rosebud Sioux Tribe. Plaintiff Webster Two Hawk claims that defendants have violated his constitutional rights of due process and equal protection of the law as guaranteed by 25 U.S.C. § 1302(8). Plaintiff Leo Cordier claims that he is an eligible voter for the office of Tribal President and the defendants’…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Williams v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Worcester v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
- Kramer v. Union Free School District No. 15Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. MazurieSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Martinez v. Santa Clara PuebloCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1976
- Webster Two Hawk v. Rosebud Sioux TribeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
- Julia Martinez v. Santa Clara PuebloCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1976