Legal Opinion
Wardrip v. Hart
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided July 30, 1996No. 94-1058-JTRPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
REID, United States Magistrate Judge.
Following a trial in this case, defendant filed- a motion for a new trial, judgment notwithstanding the verdict, and/or remittitur (Doc. 178). After that motion had been fully briefed, this court issued an order requiring that the parties further brief certain issues. Those matters have now been fully briefed by the parties.
The standards for granting a new trial are well set forth in Board of Trustees of Johnson County Community College v. National Gypsum, Co., 733 F.Supp. 1413, 1415 (D.Kan.1990); Tomson v. Stephan, 705 F.Supp. 530, 533 (D.Kan.1989).…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Diana L. Mason, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Otis W. Mason, Deceased v. Texaco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Ernest E. Riggs v. Scrivner, Inc., an Oklahoma CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Cerretti v. Flint Hills Rural Electric Cooperative Ass'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 1992
- Gould v. Taco BellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1986
- Wisker Ex Rel. Wisker v. HartSupreme Court of Kansas · 1988
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bank of New York v. Meridien BIAO Bank Tanzania Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Starlight International Inc. v. HerlihyDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1999
- Starlight International, Inc. v. HerlihyDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1998
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Thorman & Wright Corp.District Court, D. Kansas · 2007
- Bowling v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2010
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.