Legal Opinion · Concurrence

McLaughlin v. State

Court of Appeals of Alaska

Decided August 14, 2009No. A-10140Published

1ConcurrenceMannheimer, Judge

The question presented in this appeal is whether a criminal defendant can employ Alaska Civil Rule 60(b) to cireumvent the limitation periods specified in AS 12.72.020 for initiating a petition for post-conviction relief. I agree with my colleagues that Civil Rule 60(b) can not be employed in this manner, but I reach that conclusion for slightly different reasons.

The first underlying question in this case is whether Civil Rule 60(b) provides a method for attacking criminal judgements as well as civil judgements. We noted, but did not resolve, this issue in Wilson v. State, Alaska App.…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. State v. SchleeOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Ludy v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Lottie v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Burrell v. BurrellAlaska Supreme Court · 1984

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API