Legal Opinion

Dilg v. George Borgfeldt & Co.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided June 29, 1911No. 280PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern • District of New York. Suit in equity by Christian F. Dilg and Charles H. J. Dilg, partners, against George Borgfeldt & Co. Decree for defendants, and complainants appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

NOYES, Circuit Judge.

The patentees at the commencement of their specification thus describe the subject-matter of their claimed invention;

“Our invention relates to a cleaning and polishing machine adapted for use primarily for renovating articles of small size, as knives, forks, etc., or other cutlery-ware, and has for its object the provision of a machine of the class described simple in construction, inexpensive in manufacture, and efficient in j>ractical use.”

The claim in question reads as follows:

“1. In a cutlery-polishing machine, the following elements: Shafts of two rotatable cleaning…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Mark Dean Schwab v. James v. Crosby, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
  2. Linville v. MilbergerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1929
  3. Keene v. New Idea Spreader Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1916
  4. Buchanan v. Wyeth Hardware & Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
  5. Reflectolyte Co. v. Luminous Unit Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API