Legal Opinion

Nopco Chemical Co. v. Milner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 6, 1961PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover the sum of $12,674.57 as the balance alleged to be due for goods sold and delivered, in which defendants asserted a counterclaim for $300,000 based on plaintiff’s alleged breach of contract, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated July 18, 1960, denying its motion for summary judgment and to strike out defendants’ answer, pursuant to rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice. Order reversed, without costs, and plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment granted as to its cause of action and as demanded in its complaint, subject to the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dodwell & Co. v. SilvermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
  2. Smith v. Cranleigh, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928
  3. Johnson v. PetersAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1959

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. SolowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  2. GRAHAM ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED v. FellDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1963
  3. Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. SolowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API