Legal Opinion

The Southwark

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided February 15, 1904No. 116PublishedCited by 2 opinions

In Admiralty. On motion for leave to amend libel and for process in personam against owner of steamship.

1Opinion of the Court

J. B. McPHERSON, District Judge.

This action in rem was brought in February, 1895, to recover for damage to cargo amounting to $6,036. A stipulation in the sum of $7,500 was entered, and the vessel was released. The taking of testimony proceeded in a leisurely fashion, and the cause did not come up for argument until the 8th day of June, 1900. The libel was dismissed by the District Court in September of that year (104 Fed. 103), the decree being affirmed'by the Circuit Court of Appeals in the following May (108 Fed. 880, 48 C. C. A. 123). On appeal to the Supreme Court, however, the decree…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Grier v. Northern Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
  2. Bailey v. SundbergCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1892
  3. The Sarah AnnU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1835
  4. Southard v. BradyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1888
  5. Scull v. RaymondDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1883

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Westfall Larson & Co. v. All-Man-Hubble Tug Boat Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1934
  2. The BreedijkDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API