Legal Opinion

De Baca v. District Court

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 18, 1967No. 23094PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Pringle

The petitioner DeBaca sought a writ of mandamus from this Court requiring respondent, Honorable James C. Flanigan, as a judge of the District Court of the City and County of Denver, to grant him an evidentiary hearing in a post-conviction remedy proceeding. We issued a rule upon the respondent to show cause why such a hearing should not be ordered.

In the trial court, petitioner filed a petition under Colo. R. Crim. P. 35(b) to set aside a sentence imposed upon him for robbery. His conviction had previously been affirmed by this Court in DeBaca v. People, 160 Colo. 543, 418 P.2d 286. In his 35…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Robert Lee Martinez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1965
  3. George Mitchell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1966
  4. DeBaca v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1966

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. BradleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1969
  2. People v. TrujilloSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976
  3. Moore v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1971
  4. DeBaca v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1969
  5. People v. RhorerColorado Court of Appeals · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API