Peloso v. County of Putnam
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant County of Putnam appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Putnam County (Sweeny, J.), dated June 9, 2003, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it.
Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, the complaint is dismissed insofar as asserted against the appellant and the action against the remaining defendants is severed.
The Supreme Court erred in denying the motion of the defen*412dant County of Putnam for summary judgment…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Amabile v. City of BuffaloNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
- Cenname v. Town of SmithtownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Frullo v. Incorporated Village of Rockville CentreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Anderson v. Town of SmithtownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hannibal v. Incorporated VillageAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Hannibal v. Incorporated VillageAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013