Legal Opinion
Roe v. Ford Motor Company
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided January 21, 2020No. 2:18-cv-12528Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION BOBBY ROE, et al., Plaintiffs, Case No. 2:18-cv-12528 Honorable Laurie J. Michelson v. Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Defendant. OPINION AND ORDER DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION [34] AND HOLDING THE REMAINDER OF THE MOTION IN ABEYANCE PENDING SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING Plaintiffs own vehicles made by Ford Motor Company and assert that the water pumps in their vehicles’ engines broke prematurely. In Plaintiffs’ view, “Ford represents that the water pump is expected to last for…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Howard v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Louisville/Jefferson County Metro Government v. Hotels.com, L.P.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- New Albany Tractor, Inc. v. Louisville Tractor, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
- Application for Issuance of Order Requiring the United States Environmental Protection Agency to Produce Dr. Thomas Spittler to Testify by Videotape Deposition. Appeal of Sun Pipe Line CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.